Legal Opinion

Sears v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1921No. 22,813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Atchison district court; Wm. A. Jackson,' judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*517The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This is an action on a policy of accident insurance.

Plaintiff was the named beneficiary of a policy of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff’s son who was killed in an automobile accident; and the main question involved in this appeal turns on the proper significance to be given to a clause in the policy which provided that the defendant would only be liable if the accident and injuries occurred to the insured—

“While actually riding in any private automobile, provided that the insured shall not then be a hired driver thereof, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Preferred Accident Insurance v. FieldingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baugher v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Lamb v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Ætna Life Ins. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Bienz, Admx. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Dinger v. WishkenoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API