Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Michigan Congregational Conference v. United Church

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1951No. Docket 88, Calendar 44,856Published

1ConcurrenceDethmers, J.

I am unable to concur with Mr. Chief Justice Reid in reversal, although I am of the opinion that the decree of the trial court ought, in certain particulars, to be modified.

It is the well-established law of this State, declared in Fuchs v. Meisel, 102 Mich 357 (32 LRA 92); Borgman v. Bultema, 213 Mich 684; Hanna v. Malick, 223 Mich 100; and United Armenian Brethren Evangelical Church v. Kazanjian, 322 Mich 651, that while members of a church undoubtedly possess the legal right to withdraw from it, with or without reason, they may not, in'so doing, take with them, for their own purposes, or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. MeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Borgman v. BultemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Berry v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hanna v. MalickMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Windoes v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API