Michigan Congregational Conference v. United Church
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceDethmers, J.
I am unable to concur with Mr. Chief Justice Reid in reversal, although I am of the opinion that the decree of the trial court ought, in certain particulars, to be modified.
It is the well-established law of this State, declared in Fuchs v. Meisel, 102 Mich 357 (32 LRA 92); Borgman v. Bultema, 213 Mich 684; Hanna v. Malick, 223 Mich 100; and United Armenian Brethren Evangelical Church v. Kazanjian, 322 Mich 651, that while members of a church undoubtedly possess the legal right to withdraw from it, with or without reason, they may not, in'so doing, take with them, for their own purposes, or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fuchs v. MeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Borgman v. BultemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Berry v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Hanna v. MalickMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Windoes v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.