Legal Opinion
Borgman v. Bultema
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 33 opinions
Appeal from Muskegon; White (Charles E.), J., presiding. Bill by William Borgman and others against Harry Bultema and others for an injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The opinion of the trial judge is sustained by the record and by the law. It is well written. To dispose of this case we shall quote from it at length:
“Both the plaintiffs and the defendants claim to be members of a religious denomination known as the Christian Reformed Church. This religious denomination has been organized in this country since the year 1857. The First Christian Reformed Church of Muskegon is a branch or local church of this religious denomination, and is incorporated under the provisions of Act No. 118 of the Public Acts of the State of Michigan of 1901.
“The defendant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuchs v. MeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Morris Street Baptist Church v. DartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Barton v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Bear v. HeasleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bennison v. SharpMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Davis v. ScherMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Berry v. BruceMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Hanna v. MalickMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Olston v. HallockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.