Legal Opinion

Bierman v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 14, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

It being the mandate of the statute (CCA, § 1804) that the rules of substantive law are applicable to the Small Claims Court, the court below erred in departing from the traditional rules of negligence and in adopting a rule of strict liability without fault. Stability and certainty in the law require adherence to precedents by courts of original jurisdiction, and the decisions of the Court of Appeals must be followed by all lower courts (Brooks v. Horning, 27 A D 2d 874, 876 ; McGilfrey v. Hotaling, 26 A D 2d 977 ; Canter v. American Cyanamid Co., 12 A D 2d 691 ; Thomas v. Hendrickson Bros.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. George Foltis, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978
  2. Hollywood Shop, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Weiner v. Tel Aviv Car & Limousine Service, Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1988
  4. I. M. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  5. Banet v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API