Legal Opinion
Pactiv LLC v. Perez
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 4, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01296Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PACTIV LLC, Plaintiff, No. 20 CV 01296 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland MICHAEL PEREZ, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Pactiv LLC (“Pactiv”), is suing its former employee, Michael Perez (“Perez”), for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement to contract through misrepresentation. Perez has filed a motion to dismiss. (Dkt. 10). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted. LEGAL STANDARD A motion to dismiss tests the sufficiency of a complaint, not the merits of the case. See Gibson v. City of Chicago,
9…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.