Legal Opinion
O'ROURKE v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 11, 1999No. 99-934-CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (DE #58).
UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion, responses, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court enters the following Order.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Jack O’Rourke has brought this action involving a disability insurance policy that was issued to him by Defendant Provident life and Accident Insurance Company. Plaintiff has alleged that he is totally disabled, yet Defendant refuses to pay benefits to him under his insurance policy.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,589 Securities & Exchange Commission v. Esm Group, Inc., Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- William R. Milburn and Richard v. Thompson v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Blanchard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. TewSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bray & Gillespie Management LLC v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Vanguard Fire and Cas. Co. v. GolmonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Hathaway v. MEDICAL RESEARCH & TECH. AUTH.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Hathaway v. State ex rel. Medical Research & Technical AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002