Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hathaway v. State ex rel. Medical Research & Technical Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 2002No. 96,272Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKauger, J.

¶ 1 I agree with the majority that the appellant’s, Eric W. Hathaway (Hathaway/individual), suit should be allowed to proceed against the appellee, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Medical Research & Technical Authority (Authority/governmental entity). Under the facts presented—where the Authority was given timely notice of the damages claim, failed to file either a motion to arrest or to dismiss the district court action, did not raise its affirmative defense in its untimely filed answer and only sought summary judgment outside the time limits when Hathaway could have cured his premature1…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Minie v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  5. Forest Oil Corp. v. Corporation Com'n of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API