Legal Opinion
Estes v. Monroe
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 2004No. C043878PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RAYE, Acting P. J.
The California National Guard terminated a state active duty guardsman after he was paralyzed in an automobile accident. The guardsman, plaintiff Major James Estes, brought a wrongful termination claim against defendant California Military Department, alleging his discharge violated the public policy of the state to provide reasonable accommodation to disabled workers. (Gov. Code, § 12960.) Concluding that the case was not justiciable, the trial court granted the military’s demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm, based not on justiciability but on a deferential…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raine v. City of BurbankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Prue v. Brady Company/San Diego, Inc. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Acuna v. San Diego Gas & ElectricCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Davis v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.