Legal Opinion

Raine v. City of Burbank

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 2006No. B180615PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Does an employer who reassigns an employee to a temporary light-duty position to accommodate the employee’s injury have an affirmative obligation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, Government Code section 12900 et seq. (FEHA), to make that temporary light-duty assignment available indefinitely once the employee’s temporary disability becomes permanent? In addressing a similar question under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.; ADA), the federal circuit courts of appeals have uniformly held the duty to provide reasonable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Terry J. Shiring v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Scotch v. Art Institute of California-Orange County, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Wilson v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API