Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Leighton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1922No. Civil No. 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

Rhoda G. Hatch brought this action against George B. Leighton, Ed C. Jacobs and John Doe Jacobs for possession of a mining claim and damages for withholding, and from a judgment dismissing her cause of action she appeals.

It appears from the complaint that appellant is now, and was at all times after May 7, 1919, owner in fee, subject to the paramount title of the United States, of the Tehanntepee lode mining claim situate in the Ellsworth mining district, Yuma county, Ari*302zona, and that on the first day of July, 1919, defendants unlawfully and without right entered into possession of said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Childs v. FredericksonArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Merrill v. WheelerArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Skelsey v. KuhnArizona Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adkins v. AdkinsArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Navarro v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. MacDonald v. CluffArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Welch v. United Mutual Benefit Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Arnett v. HardwickArizona Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API