Legal Opinion
Anna M. Jensen v. Jack E. Potter, Postmaster General Us Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 31, 2006No. 04-4078PublishedCited by 259 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALITO, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Anna Jensen is a letter carrier with the Kingston, Pennsylvania branch of the United States Post Office. In this action against her employer, she brings claims for retaliation and sex discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The District Court granted the Postmaster General’s motion for summary judgment as to both claims, and Jensen appealed.
We will reverse and remand. With respect to retaliation, the District Court incorrectly held that coworker harassment cannot violate 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a). As to sex…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by259 opinions
- Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Moore v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Atron Castleberry v. STI GroupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
254 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.