Legal Opinion

TRANS-TEX DRILLING COMPANY v. Pittser

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1956No. 37195PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

Mary V. Pittser, hereinafter called claimant, filed her claim against Trans-Tex Drilling Company, employer, and Old Republic Insurance Company, its insurance carrier, for compensation under the death benefit provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. 85 O.S.1951 § 1 et seq. An award was made for the maximum amount and the petitioners have brought this proceeding to review said award.

Dan Pittser, hereinafter called deceased, was a mechanic in the employ of the Trans-Tex Drilling Company. He lived at Long-view, Texas. He had been stationed at Marlow, Oklahoma, since…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Parr v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Dauphine v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Baash-Ross Tool Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Bayless v. Sparkman Livestock SalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Charles H. Stanford, Inc. v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. L.E. Jones Drilling Co. v. HodgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API