Legal Opinion

State v. Addington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1977No. B-6597PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves the proper standard of proof that is required in indefinite commitment cases under the provisions of the Texas Mental Health Code. 1 Frank Addington was committed to the Austin State Hospital for an indefinite period of time after the jury found that he was mentally ill and required hospitalization for his own welfare and protection, as well as for the protection of others. The trial judge instructed the jury that the State’s burden was to prove each special issue by “clear and convincing evidence.” The court of civil appeals reversed and held that the proper standard of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Addington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. AddingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Woodard v. Texas Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API