Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Curiam,
This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, remitting the record in a workmen’s compensation case to the Board for additional findings of fact.
Although orders of this character are generally considered interlocutory, Wilk v. The Budd Company, 174 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 100 A. 2d 127 (1953), we are not without power to review them. Barber v. Fleming Raugh, Inc., 208 Pa. Superior Ct. 230, 222 A. 2d 423 (1966); Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 460, 69 A. 2d 192 (1949).
After thorough and independent study, we are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Barber v. Fleming-Raugh, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Wilk v. the Budd CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by4 opinions
- United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Hale v. Metalweld, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Penn Paper Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974