Legal Opinion
In Re IMAX Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 16, 2008No. Master File 06 Civ. 6128(NRB)PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this securities fraud class action under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j and 78t(a), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or acquired common stock in IMAX Corporation (“IMAX” or the “Company”) between February 27, 2003 and July 20, 2007 (the “class period”). The consolidated amended class action complaint (the “complaint”) alleges that the defendants,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- In Re PXRE Group, Ltd., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- In Re Ambac Financial Group, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Lehman Bros. Securities and Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Robert J. Meyer v. William Britton GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.