Legal Opinion
R. E. D. M. Corp. v. Lo Secco
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1968No. Civ. 603PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BONSAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff R.E.D.M. Corporation (plaintiff) has instituted this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361, to obtain a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant Joseph Lo Secco, a Contracting Officer, Department of the Army, (defendant) to make detailed findings of fact to supplement a written decision which he made on January 19, 1968. Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Defendant moves, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Turner v. BaxleyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1972
- Monroe Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Tempo Trucking and Transfer Corp. v. DicksonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- John P. Casarino v. United States of America, Secretary of Defense and Secretary of the Air Force, Defendants-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Etheridge v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.