Legal Opinion

Wertz Realty, Inc. v. Parden

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1992No. 13009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

The appellant, Wertz Realty, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the Kettering Municipal Court granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee, Lorina Parden.

In its sole assignment of error, Wertz Realty, Inc. (“Wertz”) asserts that the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment in favor of Parden.

The facts of the case are as follows. On March 13, 1990, Parden entered into an exclusive right to sell contract with agent Judy Hirschman of Irongate Realtors for the sale of her property located at 7400 Kings Road, Centerville, Ohio. The agreement provided…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Coast Cookies, Inc. v. Sweet Temptations, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Century 21 American Landmark, Inc. v. McIntyreOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Mahon-Evans Realty, Inc. v. SpikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. White v. NemastilOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Harley E. Rouda & Co. v. Springtime Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Ferncrest Court Partners, Ltd., Debtor. Akram Daniel v. Amci, Inc. Corson & Buckey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re Ferncrest Court Partners, Ltd., Debtor. Akram Daniel v. Amci, Inc. Corson & Buckey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API