Legal Opinion
All v. All
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided March 30, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. Bill by T. Gertrude All against Harry W. All and the National Bank of Savannah.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is a proceeding of an equitable character, originally instituted in the court of common pleas for Barn-well county on January 4, 1917, and removed from that court to this court by the defendant, on the ground that there was a separable con*122troversy between the complainant, T. Gertrude All, a citizen o£ South Carolina, and the defendant the National Bank of Savannah, a citizen of Georgia. The defendant the National Bank of Savannah has duly answered in this court, the testimony has all been taken upon the issues in the cause, and the cause, being ripe for a hearing,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Groesbeck v. MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
- Bleckley Co. v. GoodwinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Bankhead v. ShedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- In re LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Mid-City Bank & Trust Co. v. Reading Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
- Metzger v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
- Fordson Coal Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- National Bank of Savannah v. AllCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919