Legal Opinion
Insul-Wool Insulation Corp. v. Home Insulation, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 25, 1949No. 3830, 3831PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Insul-Wool Insulation Corporation, as assignee of patentee, William J. Kroop, brought these actions against Home Insulation, Inc., and Federal Insulation Company seeking an injunction and damages for an alleged infringement of its Letters Patent No. 2,166,926, for “packing and insulating material”. Upon a trial of the consolidated cases the trial court sustained the pleaded defense of invalidity on the grounds of prior knowledge and use of the patented product more than two years prior to the patentee’s application for letters patent on March 1, 1935.
The court’s findings…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chapman v. WintroathSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Godfrey v. EamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Waterman Steamship Corporation v. Gay Cottons, United States of America and Shalom Baby WearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Hertz v. GrahamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Oliver United Filters, Inc. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- American Photocopy Equipment Company v. Rovico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.