Legal Opinion
Sandhofner v. Calmenson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,814PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate resulting from injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant in operating his automobile upon Grand avenue in the city of St. Paul on September 25, 1925. There was a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying her motion for a new trial.
Decedent was riding in an automobile, owned and driven by a fellow workman, from their place of work, easterly along Grand avenue. The car stopped on the south side of the avenue opposite decedent’s home and he got out and started to cross over to his home when he was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Farrell v. G. O. Miller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Frederick v. McRaeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- McMahon v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Suess v. Arrowhead Steel Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Peterson v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Fredrickson v. Arrowhead Co-Operative Creamery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.