Legal Opinion

Nissen v. Ehrenpfort

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 2848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

The plaintiff, as the assignee of the National Bank of San Mateo, brought suit against the defendants upon five promissory notes executed by defendant Lindeman in favor of said bank, and indorsed as guarantor by defendant Ehrenpfort. Lindeman answered, setting up that in a proceeding in bankruptcy he had been duly discharged from the payment of his indebtedness represented by said promissory notes. Judgment was rendered against him for the amount due thereon, but its execution was perpetually stayed. Defendant Ehrenpfort answered, and among other defenses pleaded that since the delivery of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stillwell v. AaronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  2. Driscoll v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Pelton v. San Jacinto Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olson v. Six Rivers National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Southern California First National Bank v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Smith v. Steele Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. American Trust Co. v. GreunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Bishop v. RainboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API