Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Wheeler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action to collect rent payable under a three year lease which was signed by the defendant as the lessee, but not by plaintiff as the lessor. After paying rent for seven months defendant vacated the building subject to the lease, following an alleged oral agreement to terminate the lease. The trial court held that the lease was invalid as contrary to the statute of frauds and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts may be summarized as follows. On April 7, 1965, plaintiff and defendant entered into á written lease for 1,800 square feet of space in a commercial building…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harper v. GoldschmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wineburgh v. Toledo Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. 300 West End Avenue Corp. v. WarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Ser-Bye Corp. v. C. P. & G. Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Store Properties, Inc. v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Florida/Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. In re the Marriage of PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API