Martin v. Comcast of California/Colorado/Florida/Oregon, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Plaintiffs in this class action are cable television subscribers who claim that defendants, various regional Comcast corporations (to which we refer collectively as “Comcast”) engaged in unlawful billing practices. Comcast filed a motion to compel arbitration. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that the various agreements between Comcast and plaintiffs did not create a valid arbitration agreement. Comcast then filed this interlocutory appeal, ORS 36.730(l)(a), arguing that the trial court erred in deciding the validity of the arbitration agreement under state law instead of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. SantoroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Harnisch v. College of Legal Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Snider v. Production Chemical Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Clement v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- JELD-WEN, INC. v. PacifiCORPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.