Rogers v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant has been convicted of violation of the State prohibition law. Code 1940, Tit. 29, § 92 et seq. The affidavit filed in this case contains the averment: “That W. C. Rogers has heretofore been convicted of a similar offense.”
Our prohibition statute provides special punishment for those convicted a second or a third time of its violation.
In view of this it has been held proper to aver in the affidavit or indictment charging violation of this law that the accused has theretofore been convicted of a like or similar offense.
In Mitchell v. State, 22 Ala.App. 300, 115 So.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Abrams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- Lyles v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Napier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Paul v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Meador v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.