Legal Opinion

Foster v. Nehls

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 29, 1976No. 1398-3PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.

This is an action to enforce a restrictive covenant. The covenant provides:

No structures shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any residential building plot other than one detached single-family dwelling not to exceed one and one-half stories in height and a private garage for not more than two cars.

(Italics ours.)

Prior to construction of his home, Mr. Nehls was advised by his neighbors on several occasions that they believed his planned home to be in violation of the above restrictive covenant governing construction in their hillside subdivision. Nevertheless, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Burton v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Bach v. SarichWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Holmes Harbor Water Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Riblet v. Ideal Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lakes at Mercer Island Homeowners Ass'n v. WitrakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. White v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Bauman v. TurpenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Bauman v. TurpenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Gladstone v. GregoryNevada Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API