Poskus v. Braemoor Nursing Home, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment that a promissory note for an architect’s fee in excess of that set out in a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) form (a so called "FHA Owner-Architect Agreement”) is unenforceable. The defendant appeals from a judgment dismissing its counterclaim for $21,480 in alleged overpayments to the architect. Under a contract signed in 1967 the plaintiff was to perform architectural services for Braemoor Nursing Home, Inc., for a fee of ten per cent of the construction cost, or approximately $120,000. In *897order to obtain FHA-insured financing, in 1969 the owner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Tuttle v. Metz Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lipson v. AdelsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Horner v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Buker v. NATIONAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- D. Federico Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Starr v. J. Abrams Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.