Legal Opinion

Poskus v. Braemoor Nursing Home, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 22, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment that a promissory note for an architect’s fee in excess of that set out in a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) form (a so called "FHA Owner-Architect Agreement”) is unenforceable. The defendant appeals from a judgment dismissing its counterclaim for $21,480 in alleged overpayments to the architect. Under a contract signed in 1967 the plaintiff was to perform architectural services for Braemoor Nursing Home, Inc., for a fee of ten per cent of the construction cost, or approximately $120,000. In *897order to obtain FHA-insured financing, in 1969 the owner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Glackin v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Tuttle v. Metz Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lipson v. AdelsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  2. Horner v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Buker v. NATIONAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATIONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. D. Federico Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  5. Starr v. J. Abrams Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API