Legal Opinion

D. Federico Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 6, 1980PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Decision in this case turns on whether the plaintiff, a construction company, was bound by its contract to make a particular form of demand before bringing suit. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff on a master’s report and, save for modifications with respect to payment of interest, we affirm that judgment.

Most of the facts are not in dispute. The defendant, the New Bedford Redevelopment Authority (NBRA), invited bids for site work in connection with an urban renewal project, largely involving construction of storm drains, sanitary sewers, water mains, curbs, sidewalks and new pavement in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  2. Peters v. WallachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Pupecki v. James Madison Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Bills v. NunnoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  5. Michelson v. AronsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. D. Federico Co., Inc. (Debtor) and U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Cheschi v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Thomas O'Connor & Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. Sutton Corp. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Acme Plastering Co. v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API