Legal Opinion
Toensing v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1215PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiffs, Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova (“the plaintiffs”), have spent more than six years attempting to obtain records under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, pertaining to grand jury subpoenas issued to them in 2003. Pending before the Court are the plaintiffs’ and the defendant Department of Justice’s (“the defendant”) second round of cross motions for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 29 and 31. For the reasons set forth below, the defendant’s motion is granted and the plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
I.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wadelton v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Center for Auto Safety v. U.S. Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Wadelton v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Dalal v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Institute for Energy Research v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024