Legal Opinion

Asher v. Hart

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1951No. 38127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ethridge, C.

This case involves the question of whether a beneficiary under a mutual, reciprocal will is precluded and estopped from claiming under it because of the adjudications in a final probate decree of the estate of the first *755decedent under the will, which decree was approved by the beneficiary and the survivor under the will.

Lee R. Hart and wife, Mrs. Ida A. Hart, were residents of Jackson, Mississippi. On July 2, 1940, they executed a “mutual will”. Under one of its items, if Lee Hart’s wife survived him, he devised and bequeathed'all of his property unto her. Under Item 4, if she did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. WEBBMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Whelan v. JohnstonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Robertson v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Boxley v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Williams v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. ColemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Monroe v. HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Estate of Salter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Clayton v. James B. Clow & SonsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  5. Tyson v. PathmanDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API