Legal Opinion

Clayton v. James B. Clow & Sons

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 10, 1962No. Civ. A. 55 C 944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, by Complaint filed June 27, 1955, 1 seek restitution of 91,200 shares of common stock of James B. Clow & Sons, a corporation, 2 as a part of the testamentary trust of the late Charles R. Clow, Sr. 3 These 91,200 4 shares were the result of numerous stock splits, 5 from the 2,850 shares which had been transferred to the Company by Charles, Sr.’s widow, Hattie 6 (trustee under the testamentary trust), in these four transactions :

1,250 shares at $25 on January 15, 1935 500 shares at $30 on December 24, 1935 600 shares at $50 on April 28, 1938 500 shares at $50…

2Cases cited186 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Pyle v. FerrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flinchbaugh v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. FIRST NAT'L BANK OF CHICAGO v. EdgeworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Clayton v. James B. Clow & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  4. Clayton v. James Clow & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API