Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. WEBB

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1951No. 37807PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ethridge, C.

Appellant attacks a deed executed by his wife to her home. He asserts that he had not abandoned it as his homestead. We hold that he had voluntarily separated from her, and that the conveyance is valid.

R. W. Etheridge, appellant and complainant below, seeks to cancel a deed to a house and lot in Louisville, Mississippi, executed by his wife, Mrs. Bernice Etheridge, appellee and one of the defendants in the trial court. He says that in a legal sense he was living with his wife at the time of the conveyance, their separation being her fault, the property was his homestead, and hence…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Garland v. GarlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Winkler v. WinklerMississippi Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Helpling v. HelplingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Wilson v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Philan v. TurnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Duvall v. DuvallMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Lyle Cashion Company v. McKendrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Daigle v. DaigleMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Magee v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Garraway v. Retail Credit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API