Legal Opinion
Baxter Healthcare Corp. v. Denton
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 1, 2004No. C043352PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
Under Proposition 65, a business must provide a warning when it exposes the public to a chemical that is on a list of chemicals known to the state to cause cancer in animals. However, a warning is not required if the business can show that the exposure poses no significant risk of causing cancer in humans. (Health & Saf. Code, § 25249.5 et seq.; further section references are to the Health and Safety Code unless otherwise specified.)
Director Joan Denton and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (collectively OEHHA), which is the lead agency charged with…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Pannu v. Land Rover North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Nak Sealing Technologies Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Imagistics International, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.