United States v. Moorehead
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
DARDEN, Judge:
In this case the Court considers an issue the General Counsel of the Department of Transportation certified to us. The question is:
Was the Court of Military Review correct in determining that the Coast Guard’s method of assigning a military judge to a general court-martial complies with the requirements of Article 26(e), Uniform Code of Military Justice?
A majority of a divided Court of Military Review determined that the Coast Guard method of assigning a military judge to a general court-martial complies with Article 26(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. MabeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. BeckermannUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.