Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 19, 2014No. 7:11-CV-268-FLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint. (DE 30, 32). Plaintiff filed a response and defendants replied. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on March 8, 2012, alleging claims against: (1) defendant United States of America (“United States”), challenging a November 10, 2011, administrative decision of TRI-CARE Management Activity (“TMA”),1…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dillon v. Leazer Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Hancock v. Americo Financial Life & Annuity Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Post v. Avita Drugs, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of N.C., LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2017
- Kerry Bodenhamer Farms, LLC v. Nature's Pearl Corp.North Carolina Business Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.