Legal Opinion

Noble v. California Prune & Apricot Growers Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1929No. Docket No. 5571PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLUCAS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment sustaining defendants’ and respondents’ demurrer to an amended petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus, without leave to amend.

The amended petition in substance alleges as follows: That petitioners are residents of the county of Ventura, state of California, and owners of apricot orchards and growers of apricots in said county and state; that defendant California Prune and Apricot Growers Association is a nonprofit co-operative association without capital stock, organized under the laws of the state of California, and has its principal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bassett v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. California Canning Peach Growers v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Howe v. SouthreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Moreing v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API