Noble v. California Prune & Apricot Growers Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McLUCAS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment sustaining defendants’ and respondents’ demurrer to an amended petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus, without leave to amend.
The amended petition in substance alleges as follows: That petitioners are residents of the county of Ventura, state of California, and owners of apricot orchards and growers of apricots in said county and state; that defendant California Prune and Apricot Growers Association is a nonprofit co-operative association without capital stock, organized under the laws of the state of California, and has its principal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bassett v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Barber v. MulfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- California Canning Peach Growers v. DowneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Howe v. SouthreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Moreing v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- California Canning Peach Growers v. HarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938