Legal Opinion

LeCronier v. United Parcel Service

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 3, 2010No. 02650, Sept. Term, 2008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKehoe, J.

May a claimant aggrieved by a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission seek judicial review in the circuit court for the county in which he or she is employed, in addition to the circuit courts for the counties in which he or she resides and in which the accident occurred? The Circuit Court for Baltimore City construed § 9-738 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act”), codified as Md.Code (1991, 2008 Repl.Vol.), Lab. & Empl. § 9-101 et seq., as providing that a worker cannot, and transferred the case to the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. We reach the opposite conclusion.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Whack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Brewster v. Woodhaven Building & Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Webster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Liverpool v. Baltimore Diamond Exchange Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dinapoli v. Kent Island, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG82, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API