Legal Opinion
Hindle v. Morrison Steel Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 25, 1966PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 75 (1966)
223 A.2d 193
ALBERT E. HINDLE, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
MORRISON STEEL CO., A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND SAMUEL HAMELSKY, MAX KRAFCHIK AND JOHN D. WAIT, DEFENDANTS CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 20, 1965.
Decided July 25, 1966.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Thomas James Tumulty argued the cause for defendant-appellant-cross-respondent (Messrs. Spritzer & Spritzer, attorneys).
Mr. Robert V. Carton argued the cause for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. CarboneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Savarese v. Pyrene Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. RiosSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Bell v. Eastern Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Henkel v. Educational Research Council of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- O'Sullivan v. MallonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Pioneer National Title Insurance Co. v. LucasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Singh v. Cities Service Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.