Legal Opinion
Eilen v. Tappin's, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 25, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. Super. 53 (1951)
83 A.2d 817
YETTA EILEN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
TAPPIN'S, INC., A CORPORATION, AND FRANK GOODMAN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 25, 1951.
Mr. John K. Bangs, attorney for the plaintiff.
Mr. Saul J. Zucker, attorney for the defendants.
FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiff brought this action against defendant, Tappin's, Inc., seeking damages for breach by it of a contract under which she claims to have had lifetime employment. Defendant moved for summary judgment in its favor under Rule 3:56-3, which requires such judgment "if the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Lewis v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- State v. MaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Dennis v. Thermoid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Martin v. Federal Life Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.