Legal Opinion

BONILLA v. BUREAU OF PRISONS

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 19, 2025No. 1:24-cv-06310Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MANUEL BONILLA, Case No. 24–cv–06310–ESK–MJS Plaintiff, v. OPINION BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants. KIEL, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se plaintiff Manuel Bonilla’s civil rights complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (Torts Act),

28 U.S.C. § 2671

et seq, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971) (Complaint). (ECF No. 1.) Because plaintiff is a prisoner seeking redress from government entities and employees, I must review the Complaint to determine whether…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API