Legal Opinion

Migura v. Migura

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 12, 1987No. 13-86-463-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

Appellant appeals to this Court by writ of error. Carolyn Jean Stauss, the executrix of Emmanuel Joseph Migura’s estate, and Delphine Migura, who claims to be the common law wife of Emmanuel Migura, entered into an agreed judgment concerning the distribution of the estate. Appellant, Joy Migura, also claims to be the wife of Emmanuel Migura, pursuant to a “ceremonial marriage.”

The trial court signed and entered the agreed judgment on April 11,1986. On June 26, 1986, appellant filed her petition for writ of error and cost bond, within the six-month mandate of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Blackman v. Housing Authority of City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hamrah v. HamrahCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Anzaldua v. Whitman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Knight v. Sam Houston Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  2. Dukes v. MiguraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. NWORA v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  4. Natividad v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Joseph L. Ford, III v. Martin Mozeley Graeme Mozeley Daniel Edone And Classiques Jaguar, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API