Legal Opinion

Dukes v. Migura

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1988No. 13-87-542-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENAVIDES, Justice.

This is a suit for recovery of a debt and for foreclosure of a lien on real property securing that debt. The trial court granted a summary judgment in appellee’s favor for $25,000.00, plus attorney’s fees and interest, and foreclosed a prior lien to satisfy the debt. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in enforcing the lien because it was based on a void judgment.

The lien and debt sued upon arose from a prior suit between appellee and the representative of her alleged common law husband’s estate. Appellant was not named as a party in that earlier suit, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MMP, Ltd. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Petroleum Anchor Equipment, Inc. v. TyraTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Cox v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kubena v. HatchTexas Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Supak v. Zboril, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  2. Migura v. DukesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Larry Long and Woodbine Production Corporation v. Miken Oil, Inc. and Mike Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
  4. Nicholson v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API