Legal Opinion
Anzaldua v. Whitman
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided December 29, 1983No. 13-83-412-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Before us is appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. Final judgment was signed in this cause on June 2, 1983. The appeal bond was due to be filed within ninety (90) days of the signing of the judgment on August 31, 1983. TEX.R.CIV.P. 356(a).1 Appellants filed their appeal bond on the last day. The record was due to be filed in this Court on September 12, 1983. Rule 386.
As a result of a timely filed motion, the appellants were granted an extension of time to file the transcript and statement of facts. The transcript was subsequently timely filed with the Clerk of this Court. The…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Panhandle Const. Co. v. LindseyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- McCartney v. MeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- De Miller v. YzaguirreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- El Paso Moulding & Manufacturing Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
4Cited by5 opinions
- Migura v. Migura, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- In re WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Vickery v. Porche, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Pollak v. Metroplex Consumer Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Anzaldua v. Whitman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983