People v. Nalty
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herbert Kramer, J.
Is trial testimony of acts committed and statements made *91by a now-deceased complainant admissible as an excited utterance or spontaneous declaration to prove the identity of defendants?
FINDINGS OF FACT
Complainant, Mr. Senior, who died before trial from an unrelated cause, was seated with a woman in the front seat of his parked car. Defendants entered the vehicle, one defendant held a gun to his head and effectively prevented his companion from seeing their faces. They demanded his jewelry, which was unique, and fled the scene on foot.
Police officers were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. CavinessNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. LaganaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MendezNew York Supreme Court · 1992