Legal Opinion

Shultz & Co. v. Johnson's Administrator

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 16, 1845PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Breck

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of covenant, brought by William H. Johnson, administrator of Elijah Johnson, against the plaintiffs in error, upon the following obligation;

"An agreement made this day between Elijah Johnson, of the first part, and C. Shultz & Co., of the second part, all of the county of Mason, and State of Kentucky, witnesseth; that the said Elijah Johnson, of the first part, engages to furnish C. Shultz «fe Co., of the second part, six successive crops of hemp of his oion raising, embracing each year all the hemp he can raise upon not less…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Mueller v. Northwestern UniversityIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Janin v. BrowneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McGill's creditors v. McGill's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  5. New England Cabinet Works v. MorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API