Legal Opinion
Comcast Sound Communications Inc. v. Hoeltke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion granted in part and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred by denying defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We have recently stated that non-competition clauses such as those contained in the employment contracts that plaintiff entered into with defendants, Michael Hoeltke and Greg Nolte, are "disfavored by the law” (Buffalo Imprints v Scinta, 144 AD2d 1025, 1026; see also, Newco Waste Sys. v Swartzenberg, 125 AD2d 1004, 1005). Such restrictive covenants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Manufacturing Co. v. A-1-A Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Walter Karl, Inc. v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kraft Agency, Inc. v. DelmonicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Briskin v. All Seasons Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ken J. Pezrow Corp. v. SeifertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Falco v. ParryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. TroiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- ICS/Executone Telecom, Inc. v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991