Legal Opinion
Mirza v. Insurance Administrator of America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 2015No. 13-3535PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
The regulations implementing the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., provide that when a plan administrator denies a request for benefits, it must set forth a “description of the plan’s review procedures and the time limits applicable to such procedures, including a statement of the claimant’s right to bring a civil action.” 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-l(g)(l)(iv). The ERISA plan at issue in this case contains a one-year deadline for filing a civil action. Appellant Dr. Neville Mirza received a benefits…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Gagliano v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Sally J. Burke v. Kodak Retirement Income Plan and Kodak Retirement Income Plan CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Hudson United Bank v. Litenda Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. La. Health Serv. & Indem. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Santana-Diaz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Stacy S. v. Boeing Co. Emp. Health Benefit PlanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- A. v. United Healthcare InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY CHIROPRACTORS v. AETNA, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.