Legal Opinion
Stacy S. v. Boeing Co. Emp. Health Benefit Plan
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 25, 2018No. Case No.: 1:15-CV-72PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. SHELBY, United States District Judge
This case involves medical treatment that M.K., a minor, received from March 27 to July 1, 2013. Plaintiff, M.K.'s mother, brought this action for recovery of medical benefits that Defendants Boeing Company Employee Health Benefit Plan and ValueOptions (collectively, ValueOptions) denied. Plaintiff and ValueOptions each filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED1 and ValueOptions' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.2
BACKGROUND
M.K. is a beneficiary of the Boeing Company…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hamdan v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A. v. United Healthcare InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- F. v. United Healthcare InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2022
- L. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Smith v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2023
- W. v. Health Net Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.