Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 14, 2018No. SC 19945PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKahn, J.

**712The sole question presented in this certified public interest appeal is whether General Statutes § 52-470 divests the habeas court of discretion to determine when it should act on a motion by the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, for an order to show cause why an untimely petition should be permitted to proceed. In the present case, the habeas court took no action on the motion of the respondent requesting the **713court, pursuant to § 52-470 (d) and (e), to order the petitioner, Eric Thomas Kelsey, to show cause why his petition should be permitted to proceed despite his delay…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Langston v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Halladay v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  3. Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  4. Finney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  5. Rose v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API