Legal Opinion

Wysocki v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1977No. Docket 29314PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtV. J. Brennan, J.

Plaintiff Andrew Wysocki, Jr., filed a complaint and petition for order to show cause on March 19, 1976, to prevent defendant Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange from reducing benefits payable to plaintiff under its policy of insurance. Plaintiff contended that a provision of the Michigan no-fault act which provides for the deduction of governmental benefits from the personal protection insurance benefits provided by the act was unconstitutional. MCLA 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1). Plaintiff also con tended that the policy provision to the same effect was contrary to the spirit and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Fox v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Alexander v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pollock v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Smith v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API