Legal Opinion
United States v. Flannigan
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided July 27, 1989No. ACM 27052PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge:
In this court-martial, the Government alleges that the appellant, an agent of the Office of Special Investigations (OSI), has “gone bad” and tarnished himself with “drugs, sex, and lies.” The case involves the significant issue of whether the Air Force validly claimed the national security privilege under Mil.R.Evid. 505.
In spite of his pleas, Staff Sergeant Flannigan was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of members of dereliction of duty, wrongful use of marijuana, and adultery with LEJ, in violation of Articles 92, 112a, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Henry BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States of America Ex Rel. Robert W. Lloyd v. Leon J. Vincent, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility,respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BranoffU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. FlanniganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990